Laos vs Tunisia: Democracy

Laos
1
in 2025
Tunisia
1
in 2025
Laos rank
159th
Tunisia rank
159th

Democracy over time

  • Laos
  • Tunisia
0246178919072025

How they compare

Laos currently reports 1 against 1 in Tunisia, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 237 shared years of data; in 1789 it was Tunisia ahead.

Laos ranks 159th and Tunisia ranks 159th of 197 countries.

Across the 25 decades both report, Laos averaged higher in 8 and Tunisia in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Laos Tunisia Difference Ahead
1780s 0 0 0
1790s 0 0 0
1800s 0 0 0
1810s 0 0 0
1820s 0 0 0
1830s 0 0 0
1840s 0 0 0
1850s 0 0 0
1860s 0 0 0
1870s 0 0 0
1880s 0 0 0
1890s 0 0 0
1900s 2 0 2 Laos
1910s 2 0 2 Laos
1920s 2 0 2 Laos
1930s 2 0 2 Laos
1940s 2 0 2 Laos
1950s 3.7 0.6 3.1 Laos
1960s 3 1 2 Laos
1970s 1.3 1 0.3 Laos
1980s 0.1 1 0.9 Tunisia
1990s 1 1.2 0.2 Tunisia
2000s 1 3 2 Tunisia
2010s 1 5.7 4.7 Tunisia
2020s 1 1.83 0.8333 Tunisia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher democracy, Laos or Tunisia?
Laos, at 1 against 1 in Tunisia as of 2025.
What is the difference in democracy between Laos and Tunisia?
0, with Laos ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Laos and Tunisia?
237 years are reported by both, from 1789 to 2025.
How do Laos and Tunisia rank globally for democracy?
Laos ranks 159th and Tunisia ranks 159th of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Democracy. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Democracy
Source
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
198 places, 32,485 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Identifies the political regime of a country. It distinguishes between non-electoral autocracies (score 0), one-party autocracies (score 1), multi-party autocracies without elected executive (score 2), multi-party autocracies (score 3), exclusive democracies (score 4), male democracies (score 5), electoral democracies (score 6), and full democracies (score 7).