Guinea-Bissau vs Niger: Democracy

Guinea-Bissau
0
in 2025
Niger
0
in 2025
Guinea-Bissau rank
175th
Niger rank
175th

Democracy over time

  • Guinea-Bissau
  • Niger
0246189219582025

How they compare

Guinea-Bissau currently reports 0 against 0 in Niger, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 12 times across 104 shared years of data; in 1922 it was Niger ahead.

Guinea-Bissau ranks 175th and Niger ranks 175th of 197 countries.

Across the 11 decades both report, Guinea-Bissau averaged higher in 2 and Niger in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guinea-Bissau Niger Difference Ahead
1920s 0 0 0
1930s 0 0 0
1940s 0 0.4 0.4 Niger
1950s 0 0.6 0.6 Niger
1960s 0 2 2 Niger
1970s 0.3 0.4 0.1 Niger
1980s 0.6 0.1 0.5 Guinea-Bissau
1990s 3.4 3.6 0.2 Niger
2000s 4.5 5.5 1 Niger
2010s 4.2 4.2 0
2020s 3.33 2.5 0.8333 Guinea-Bissau

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher democracy, Guinea-Bissau or Niger?
Guinea-Bissau, at 0 against 0 in Niger as of 2025.
What is the difference in democracy between Guinea-Bissau and Niger?
0, with Guinea-Bissau ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea-Bissau and Niger?
104 years are reported by both, from 1922 to 2025.
How do Guinea-Bissau and Niger rank globally for democracy?
Guinea-Bissau ranks 175th and Niger ranks 175th of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Democracy. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Democracy
Source
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
198 places, 32,485 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Identifies the political regime of a country. It distinguishes between non-electoral autocracies (score 0), one-party autocracies (score 1), multi-party autocracies without elected executive (score 2), multi-party autocracies (score 3), exclusive democracies (score 4), male democracies (score 5), electoral democracies (score 6), and full democracies (score 7).