Guinea-Bissau vs Myanmar: Democracy

Guinea-Bissau
0
in 2025
Myanmar
0
in 2025
Guinea-Bissau rank
175th
Myanmar rank
175th

Democracy over time

  • Guinea-Bissau
  • Myanmar
0246178919072025

How they compare

Guinea-Bissau currently reports 0 against 0 in Myanmar, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 134 shared years of data; in 1892 it was Myanmar ahead.

Guinea-Bissau ranks 175th and Myanmar ranks 175th of 197 countries.

Across the 14 decades both report, Guinea-Bissau averaged higher in 3 and Myanmar in 8.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guinea-Bissau Myanmar Difference Ahead
1890s 0 0 0
1900s 0 0 0
1910s 0 0 0
1920s 0 1.6 1.6 Myanmar
1930s 0 2 2 Myanmar
1940s 0 2.8 2.8 Myanmar
1950s 0 4.8 4.8 Myanmar
1960s 0 1.2 1.2 Myanmar
1970s 0.3 0.6 0.3 Myanmar
1980s 0.6 0.8 0.2 Myanmar
1990s 3.4 0 3.4 Guinea-Bissau
2000s 4.5 0.9 3.6 Guinea-Bissau
2010s 4.2 4.5 0.3 Myanmar
2020s 3.33 1 2.33 Guinea-Bissau

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher democracy, Guinea-Bissau or Myanmar?
Guinea-Bissau, at 0 against 0 in Myanmar as of 2025.
What is the difference in democracy between Guinea-Bissau and Myanmar?
0, with Guinea-Bissau ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea-Bissau and Myanmar?
134 years are reported by both, from 1892 to 2025.
How do Guinea-Bissau and Myanmar rank globally for democracy?
Guinea-Bissau ranks 175th and Myanmar ranks 175th of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Democracy. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Democracy
Source
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
198 places, 32,485 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Identifies the political regime of a country. It distinguishes between non-electoral autocracies (score 0), one-party autocracies (score 1), multi-party autocracies without elected executive (score 2), multi-party autocracies (score 3), exclusive democracies (score 4), male democracies (score 5), electoral democracies (score 6), and full democracies (score 7).