Guinea-Bissau vs Kuwait: Democracy

Guinea-Bissau
0
in 2025
Kuwait
0
in 2025
Guinea-Bissau rank
175th
Kuwait rank
175th

Democracy over time

  • Guinea-Bissau
  • Kuwait
0246178919072025

How they compare

Guinea-Bissau currently reports 0 against 0 in Kuwait, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 12 times across 134 shared years of data; in 1892 it was Kuwait ahead.

Guinea-Bissau ranks 175th and Kuwait ranks 175th of 197 countries.

Across the 14 decades both report, Guinea-Bissau averaged higher in 4 and Kuwait in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guinea-Bissau Kuwait Difference Ahead
1890s 0 0 0
1900s 0 0 0
1910s 0 0 0
1920s 0 0 0
1930s 0 0 0
1940s 0 0 0
1950s 0 0 0
1960s 0 1.8 1.8 Kuwait
1970s 0.3 1.2 0.9 Kuwait
1980s 0.6 1 0.4 Kuwait
1990s 3.4 1.6 1.8 Guinea-Bissau
2000s 4.5 2 2.5 Guinea-Bissau
2010s 4.2 2 2.2 Guinea-Bissau
2020s 3.33 1.33 2 Guinea-Bissau

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher democracy, Guinea-Bissau or Kuwait?
Guinea-Bissau, at 0 against 0 in Kuwait as of 2025.
What is the difference in democracy between Guinea-Bissau and Kuwait?
0, with Guinea-Bissau ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea-Bissau and Kuwait?
134 years are reported by both, from 1892 to 2025.
How do Guinea-Bissau and Kuwait rank globally for democracy?
Guinea-Bissau ranks 175th and Kuwait ranks 175th of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Democracy. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Democracy
Source
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
198 places, 32,485 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Identifies the political regime of a country. It distinguishes between non-electoral autocracies (score 0), one-party autocracies (score 1), multi-party autocracies without elected executive (score 2), multi-party autocracies (score 3), exclusive democracies (score 4), male democracies (score 5), electoral democracies (score 6), and full democracies (score 7).