Equatorial Guinea vs Serbia: Democracy

Equatorial Guinea
3
in 2025
Serbia
3
in 2025
Equatorial Guinea rank
116th
Serbia rank
116th

Democracy over time

  • Equatorial Guinea
  • Serbia
0246180419142025

How they compare

Equatorial Guinea currently reports 3 against 3 in Serbia, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 126 shared years of data; in 1900 it was Serbia ahead.

Equatorial Guinea ranks 116th and Serbia ranks 116th of 197 countries.

Serbia has averaged higher in every one of the 13 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Equatorial Guinea Serbia Difference Ahead
1900s 0 3.4 3.4 Serbia
1910s 0 2 2 Serbia
1920s 0 4.5 4.5 Serbia
1930s 0 1.9 1.9 Serbia
1940s 0 0.8 0.8 Serbia
1950s 0 1 1 Serbia
1960s 0.6 1 0.4 Serbia
1970s 0.2 1 0.8 Serbia
1980s 0.7 1 0.3 Serbia
1990s 2.4 3 0.6 Serbia
2000s 3 6 3 Serbia
2010s 3 6 3 Serbia
2020s 3 3 0

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher democracy, Equatorial Guinea or Serbia?
Equatorial Guinea, at 3 against 3 in Serbia as of 2025.
What is the difference in democracy between Equatorial Guinea and Serbia?
0, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Serbia?
126 years are reported by both, from 1900 to 2025.
How do Equatorial Guinea and Serbia rank globally for democracy?
Equatorial Guinea ranks 116th and Serbia ranks 116th of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Democracy. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Democracy
Source
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
198 places, 32,485 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Identifies the political regime of a country. It distinguishes between non-electoral autocracies (score 0), one-party autocracies (score 1), multi-party autocracies without elected executive (score 2), multi-party autocracies (score 3), exclusive democracies (score 4), male democracies (score 5), electoral democracies (score 6), and full democracies (score 7).