Luxembourg vs New Zealand: Democracy
Luxembourg
4
in 2025
New Zealand
4
in 2025
Luxembourg rank
17th
New Zealand rank
17th
Democracy over time
- Luxembourg
- New Zealand
How they compare
Luxembourg currently reports 4 against 4 in New Zealand, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 111 shared years of data; in 1915 it was New Zealand ahead.
Luxembourg ranks 17th and New Zealand ranks 17th of 175 countries.
Across the 12 decades both report, Luxembourg averaged higher in 1 and New Zealand in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Luxembourg | New Zealand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1910s | 2 | 4 | 2 | New Zealand |
| 1920s | 4.1 | 4 | 0.1 | Luxembourg |
| 1930s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
| 1940s | 2.3 | 4 | 1.7 | New Zealand |
| 1950s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
| 1960s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
| 1970s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
| 1980s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher democracy, Luxembourg or New Zealand?
- Luxembourg, at 4 against 4 in New Zealand as of 2025.
- What is the difference in democracy between Luxembourg and New Zealand?
- 0, with Luxembourg ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Luxembourg and New Zealand?
- 111 years are reported by both, from 1915 to 2025.
- How do Luxembourg and New Zealand rank globally for democracy?
- Luxembourg ranks 17th and New Zealand ranks 17th of 175 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Episodes of Regime Transformation (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Democracy. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Political regime of a country using the classification by the Episodes of Regime Transformation-project. It distinguishes between hardening autocracies (score 0), stable autocracies (score 1), liberalizing autocracies (score 2), eroding democracies (score 3), stable democracies (score 4), and deepening democracies (score 5).