Ghana vs Luxembourg: Democracy
Ghana
4
in 2025
Luxembourg
4
in 2025
Ghana rank
17th
Luxembourg rank
17th
Democracy over time
- Ghana
- Luxembourg
How they compare
Ghana currently reports 4 against 4 in Luxembourg, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 111 shared years of data; in 1915 it was Luxembourg ahead.
Ghana ranks 17th and Luxembourg ranks 17th of 175 countries.
Across the 12 decades both report, Ghana averaged higher in 1 and Luxembourg in 11.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ghana | Luxembourg | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1910s | 1 | 2 | 1 | Luxembourg |
| 1920s | 1 | 4.1 | 3.1 | Luxembourg |
| 1930s | 1 | 4 | 3 | Luxembourg |
| 1940s | 1.4 | 2.3 | 0.9 | Luxembourg |
| 1950s | 1.1 | 4 | 2.9 | Luxembourg |
| 1960s | 0.4 | 4 | 3.6 | Luxembourg |
| 1970s | 1.1 | 4 | 2.9 | Luxembourg |
| 1980s | 0.9 | 4 | 3.1 | Luxembourg |
| 1990s | 3 | 4 | 1 | Luxembourg |
| 2000s | 4.3 | 4 | 0.3 | Ghana |
| 2010s | 3.3 | 4 | 0.7 | Luxembourg |
| 2020s | 3.67 | 4 | 0.3333 | Luxembourg |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher democracy, Ghana or Luxembourg?
- Ghana, at 4 against 4 in Luxembourg as of 2025.
- What is the difference in democracy between Ghana and Luxembourg?
- 0, with Ghana ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ghana and Luxembourg?
- 111 years are reported by both, from 1915 to 2025.
- How do Ghana and Luxembourg rank globally for democracy?
- Ghana ranks 17th and Luxembourg ranks 17th of 175 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Episodes of Regime Transformation (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Democracy. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Political regime of a country using the classification by the Episodes of Regime Transformation-project. It distinguishes between hardening autocracies (score 0), stable autocracies (score 1), liberalizing autocracies (score 2), eroding democracies (score 3), stable democracies (score 4), and deepening democracies (score 5).