Equatorial Guinea vs Laos: Democracy
Equatorial Guinea
1
in 2025
Laos
1
in 2025
Equatorial Guinea rank
90th
Laos rank
90th
Democracy over time
- Equatorial Guinea
- Laos
How they compare
Equatorial Guinea currently reports 1 against 1 in Laos, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 126 shared years of data; in 1900 it was Laos ahead.
Equatorial Guinea ranks 90th and Laos ranks 90th of 175 countries.
Across the 13 decades both report, Equatorial Guinea averaged higher in 2 and Laos in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Equatorial Guinea | Laos | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1910s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1920s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1930s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1940s | 1 | 1.4 | 0.4 | Laos |
| 1950s | 1 | 1.7 | 0.7 | Laos |
| 1960s | 1.1 | 0.4 | 0.7 | Equatorial Guinea |
| 1970s | 0.7 | 0.8 | 0.1 | Laos |
| 1980s | 1.7 | 1 | 0.7 | Equatorial Guinea |
| 1990s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher democracy, Equatorial Guinea or Laos?
- Equatorial Guinea, at 1 against 1 in Laos as of 2025.
- What is the difference in democracy between Equatorial Guinea and Laos?
- 0, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Laos?
- 126 years are reported by both, from 1900 to 2025.
- How do Equatorial Guinea and Laos rank globally for democracy?
- Equatorial Guinea ranks 90th and Laos ranks 90th of 175 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Episodes of Regime Transformation (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Democracy. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Political regime of a country using the classification by the Episodes of Regime Transformation-project. It distinguishes between hardening autocracies (score 0), stable autocracies (score 1), liberalizing autocracies (score 2), eroding democracies (score 3), stable democracies (score 4), and deepening democracies (score 5).