Equatorial Guinea vs Jordan: Democracy
Equatorial Guinea
1
in 2025
Jordan
1
in 2025
Equatorial Guinea rank
90th
Jordan rank
90th
Democracy over time
- Equatorial Guinea
- Jordan
How they compare
Equatorial Guinea currently reports 1 against 1 in Jordan, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 104 shared years of data; in 1922 it was Jordan ahead.
Equatorial Guinea ranks 90th and Jordan ranks 90th of 175 countries.
Across the 11 decades both report, Equatorial Guinea averaged higher in 2 and Jordan in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Equatorial Guinea | Jordan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1920s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1930s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1940s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1950s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1960s | 1.1 | 1 | 0.1 | Equatorial Guinea |
| 1970s | 0.7 | 1 | 0.3 | Jordan |
| 1980s | 1.7 | 1.1 | 0.6 | Equatorial Guinea |
| 1990s | 1 | 1.1 | 0.1 | Jordan |
| 2000s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher democracy, Equatorial Guinea or Jordan?
- Equatorial Guinea, at 1 against 1 in Jordan as of 2025.
- What is the difference in democracy between Equatorial Guinea and Jordan?
- 0, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Jordan?
- 104 years are reported by both, from 1922 to 2025.
- How do Equatorial Guinea and Jordan rank globally for democracy?
- Equatorial Guinea ranks 90th and Jordan ranks 90th of 175 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Episodes of Regime Transformation (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Democracy. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Political regime of a country using the classification by the Episodes of Regime Transformation-project. It distinguishes between hardening autocracies (score 0), stable autocracies (score 1), liberalizing autocracies (score 2), eroding democracies (score 3), stable democracies (score 4), and deepening democracies (score 5).