Ecuador vs Namibia: Democracy

Ecuador
4
in 2025
Namibia
4
in 2025
Ecuador rank
17th
Namibia rank
17th

Democracy over time

  • Ecuador
  • Namibia
012345190019622025

How they compare

Ecuador currently reports 4 against 4 in Namibia, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 12 times across 126 shared years of data; in 1900 it was Namibia ahead.

Ecuador ranks 17th and Namibia ranks 17th of 172 countries.

Across the 13 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 4 and Namibia in 7.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Namibia Difference Ahead
1900s 0.9 1 0.1 Namibia
1910s 1.2 1 0.2 Ecuador
1920s 1 1 0
1930s 0.7 1 0.3 Namibia
1940s 1.3 1 0.3 Ecuador
1950s 1 1 0
1960s 0.8 1 0.2 Namibia
1970s 0.8 1 0.2 Namibia
1980s 4.1 2 2.1 Ecuador
1990s 4 4.6 0.6 Namibia
2000s 3.7 4 0.3 Namibia
2010s 3.9 4 0.1 Namibia
2020s 4.5 4 0.5 Ecuador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher democracy, Ecuador or Namibia?
Ecuador, at 4 against 4 in Namibia as of 2025.
What is the difference in democracy between Ecuador and Namibia?
0, with Ecuador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Namibia?
126 years are reported by both, from 1900 to 2025.
How do Ecuador and Namibia rank globally for democracy?
Ecuador ranks 17th and Namibia ranks 17th of 172 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Episodes of Regime Transformation (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Democracy. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Democracy
Source
Episodes of Regime Transformation (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
175 places, 19,128 data points, 1900–2025
Last refreshed

Political regime of a country using the classification by the Episodes of Regime Transformation-project. It distinguishes between hardening autocracies (score 0), stable autocracies (score 1), liberalizing autocracies (score 2), eroding democracies (score 3), stable democracies (score 4), and deepening democracies (score 5).