Iraq vs Tunisia: Democracy

Iraq
3
in 2025
Tunisia
3
in 2025
Iraq rank
94th
Tunisia rank
94th

Democracy over time

  • Iraq
  • Tunisia
0246178919072025

How they compare

Iraq currently reports 3 against 3 in Tunisia, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 237 shared years of data; in 1789 it was Tunisia ahead.

Iraq ranks 94th and Tunisia ranks 94th of 176 countries.

Across the 25 decades both report, Iraq averaged higher in 1 and Tunisia in 7.

Head to head by decade

Decade Iraq Tunisia Difference Ahead
1780s 0 0 0 β€”
1790s 0 0 0 β€”
1800s 0 0 0 β€”
1810s 0 0 0 β€”
1820s 0 0 0 β€”
1830s 0 0 0 β€”
1840s 0 0 0 β€”
1850s 0 0 0 β€”
1860s 0 0 0 β€”
1870s 0 0 0 β€”
1880s 0 0 0 β€”
1890s 0 0 0 β€”
1900s 0 0 0 β€”
1910s 0 0 0 β€”
1920s 0 0 0 β€”
1930s 0 0 0 β€”
1940s 0 0 0 β€”
1950s 1.7 0.3 1.4 Iraq
1960s 0 3 3 Tunisia
1970s 0 3 3 Tunisia
1980s 0 2.4 2.4 Tunisia
1990s 1 3 2 Tunisia
2000s 1.5 3 1.5 Tunisia
2010s 3 5.4 2.4 Tunisia
2020s 3 4 1 Tunisia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher democracy, Iraq or Tunisia?
Iraq, at 3 against 3 in Tunisia as of 2025.
What is the difference in democracy between Iraq and Tunisia?
0, with Iraq ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Iraq and Tunisia?
237 years are reported by both, from 1789 to 2025.
How do Iraq and Tunisia rank globally for democracy?
Iraq ranks 94th and Tunisia ranks 94th of 176 countries.
Where does this data come from?
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Democracy. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Democracy
Source
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
176 places, 29,594 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Political regime of a country using the Regimes of the World classification by political scientists Anna LΓΌhrmann, Marcus Tannenberg and Staffan Lindberg, including ambiguous categories.