Equatorial Guinea vs Philippines: Democracy

Equatorial Guinea
3
in 2025
Philippines
3
in 2025
Equatorial Guinea rank
94th
Philippines rank
94th

Democracy over time

  • Equatorial Guinea
  • Philippines
0246190019622025

How they compare

Equatorial Guinea currently reports 3 against 3 in Philippines, a difference of 0.

Across all 119 years both countries report, Philippines has been ahead every year.

Equatorial Guinea ranks 94th and Philippines ranks 94th of 176 countries.

Philippines has averaged higher in every one of the 13 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Equatorial Guinea Philippines Difference Ahead
1900s 0 0 0
1910s 0 0 0
1920s 0 0 0
1930s 0 1.5 1.5 Philippines
1940s 0 1.8 1.8 Philippines
1950s 0 3 3 Philippines
1960s 0.6 3 2.4 Philippines
1970s 2 3 1 Philippines
1980s 0 2.6 2.6 Philippines
1990s 1.8 5.4 3.6 Philippines
2000s 3 4.5 1.5 Philippines
2010s 2.7 4.5 1.8 Philippines
2020s 2.67 3 0.3333 Philippines

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher democracy, Equatorial Guinea or Philippines?
Equatorial Guinea, at 3 against 3 in Philippines as of 2025.
What is the difference in democracy between Equatorial Guinea and Philippines?
0, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Philippines?
119 years are reported by both, from 1900 to 2025.
How do Equatorial Guinea and Philippines rank globally for democracy?
Equatorial Guinea ranks 94th and Philippines ranks 94th of 176 countries.
Where does this data come from?
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Democracy. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Democracy
Source
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
176 places, 29,594 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Political regime of a country using the Regimes of the World classification by political scientists Anna Lührmann, Marcus Tannenberg and Staffan Lindberg, including ambiguous categories.