Equatorial Guinea vs Mozambique: Democracy

Equatorial Guinea
3
in 2025
Mozambique
3
in 2025
Equatorial Guinea rank
94th
Mozambique rank
94th

Democracy over time

  • Equatorial Guinea
  • Mozambique
01234190019622025

How they compare

Equatorial Guinea currently reports 3 against 3 in Mozambique, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 119 shared years of data; in 1900 it was Mozambique ahead.

Equatorial Guinea ranks 94th and Mozambique ranks 94th of 176 countries.

Across the 13 decades both report, Equatorial Guinea averaged higher in 2 and Mozambique in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Equatorial Guinea Mozambique Difference Ahead
1900s 0 0 0
1910s 0 0 0
1920s 0 0 0
1930s 0 0 0
1940s 0 0 0
1950s 0 0 0
1960s 0.6 0 0.6 Equatorial Guinea
1970s 2 0 2 Equatorial Guinea
1980s 0 0 0
1990s 1.8 2.3 0.5 Mozambique
2000s 3 3.3 0.3 Mozambique
2010s 2.7 3 0.3 Mozambique
2020s 2.67 3 0.3333 Mozambique

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher democracy, Equatorial Guinea or Mozambique?
Equatorial Guinea, at 3 against 3 in Mozambique as of 2025.
What is the difference in democracy between Equatorial Guinea and Mozambique?
0, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Mozambique?
119 years are reported by both, from 1900 to 2025.
How do Equatorial Guinea and Mozambique rank globally for democracy?
Equatorial Guinea ranks 94th and Mozambique ranks 94th of 176 countries.
Where does this data come from?
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Democracy. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Democracy
Source
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
176 places, 29,594 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Political regime of a country using the Regimes of the World classification by political scientists Anna Lührmann, Marcus Tannenberg and Staffan Lindberg, including ambiguous categories.