Equatorial Guinea vs Hungary: Democracy

Equatorial Guinea
3
in 2025
Hungary
3
in 2025
Equatorial Guinea rank
94th
Hungary rank
94th

Democracy over time

  • Equatorial Guinea
  • Hungary
0246810178919072025

How they compare

Equatorial Guinea currently reports 3 against 3 in Hungary, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 119 shared years of data; in 1900 it was Hungary ahead.

Equatorial Guinea ranks 94th and Hungary ranks 94th of 176 countries.

Across the 13 decades both report, Equatorial Guinea averaged higher in 2 and Hungary in 10.

Head to head by decade

Decade Equatorial Guinea Hungary Difference Ahead
1900s 0 3 3 Hungary
1910s 0 3 3 Hungary
1920s 0 3 3 Hungary
1930s 0 3 3 Hungary
1940s 0 2.7 2.7 Hungary
1950s 0 0 0
1960s 0.6 0 0.6 Equatorial Guinea
1970s 2 0 2 Equatorial Guinea
1980s 0 0.2 0.2 Hungary
1990s 1.8 8.2 6.4 Hungary
2000s 3 8.9 5.9 Hungary
2010s 2.7 5.5 2.8 Hungary
2020s 2.67 3.33 0.6667 Hungary

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher democracy, Equatorial Guinea or Hungary?
Equatorial Guinea, at 3 against 3 in Hungary as of 2025.
What is the difference in democracy between Equatorial Guinea and Hungary?
0, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Hungary?
119 years are reported by both, from 1900 to 2025.
How do Equatorial Guinea and Hungary rank globally for democracy?
Equatorial Guinea ranks 94th and Hungary ranks 94th of 176 countries.
Where does this data come from?
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Democracy. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Democracy
Source
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
176 places, 29,594 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Political regime of a country using the Regimes of the World classification by political scientists Anna Lührmann, Marcus Tannenberg and Staffan Lindberg, including ambiguous categories.