Ecuador vs Romania: Democracy

Ecuador
6
in 2025
Romania
6
in 2025
Ecuador rank
42nd
Romania rank
42nd

Democracy over time

  • Ecuador
  • Romania
0246183019272025

How they compare

Ecuador currently reports 6 against 6 in Romania, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 20 times across 188 shared years of data; in 1831 it was Romania ahead.

Ecuador ranks 42nd and Romania ranks 42nd of 176 countries.

Across the 20 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 12 and Romania in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Romania Difference Ahead
1830s 0 0 0
1840s 0 0.1 0.1 Romania
1850s 0.6667 0 0.6667 Ecuador
1860s 0.75 0 0.75 Ecuador
1870s 0 0 0
1880s 0.3333 0 0.3333 Ecuador
1890s 2.33 0 2.33 Ecuador
1900s 1.8 0 1.8 Ecuador
1910s 2.7 0 2.7 Ecuador
1920s 2.7 0 2.7 Ecuador
1930s 2.1 0 2.1 Ecuador
1940s 2.1 0 2.1 Ecuador
1950s 3 0 3 Ecuador
1960s 1.5 1.8 0.3 Romania
1970s 0.6667 1.44 0.7778 Romania
1980s 6 1 5 Ecuador
1990s 6 5.4 0.6 Ecuador
2000s 6 6 0
2010s 5.5 6 0.5 Romania
2020s 6 6 0

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher democracy, Ecuador or Romania?
Ecuador, at 6 against 6 in Romania as of 2025.
What is the difference in democracy between Ecuador and Romania?
0, with Ecuador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Romania?
188 years are reported by both, from 1831 to 2025.
How do Ecuador and Romania rank globally for democracy?
Ecuador ranks 42nd and Romania ranks 42nd of 176 countries.
Where does this data come from?
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Democracy. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Democracy
Source
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
176 places, 29,594 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Political regime of a country using the Regimes of the World classification by political scientists Anna Lührmann, Marcus Tannenberg and Staffan Lindberg, including ambiguous categories.