Zambia vs Zimbabwe: Pm exposure 1990 2017, per capita
Zambia
0 units per person
in 2023
Zimbabwe
0 units per person
in 2023
Zambia rank
139th
Zimbabwe rank
142nd
Pm exposure 1990 2017, per capita over time
- Zambia
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zambia currently reports 0 units per person against 0 units per person in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0 units per person.
That makes Zambia's figure about 1.1 times Zimbabwe's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Zambia ahead.
Zambia ranks 139th and Zimbabwe ranks 142nd of 200 countries.
Zambia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Zambia | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | Zambia |
| 2000s | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | Zambia |
| 2010s | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | Zambia |
| 2020s | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | Zambia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher pm exposure 1990 2017, per capita, Zambia or Zimbabwe?
- Zambia, at 0 units per person against 0 units per person in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
- What is the difference in pm exposure 1990 2017, per capita between Zambia and Zimbabwe?
- 0 units per person, with Zambia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Zambia and Zimbabwe?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
- How do Zambia and Zimbabwe rank globally for pm exposure 1990 2017, per capita?
- Zambia ranks 139th and Zimbabwe ranks 142nd of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Pm exposure 1990 2017, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Pm exposure 1990 2017 divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.