Sweden vs Uganda: Pm exposure 1990 2017, per capita
Sweden
0 units per person
in 2023
Uganda
0 units per person
in 2023
Sweden rank
160th
Uganda rank
158th
Pm exposure 1990 2017, per capita over time
- Sweden
- Uganda
How they compare
Uganda currently reports 0 units per person against 0 units per person in Sweden, a difference of 0 units per person.
That makes Uganda's figure about 1.3 times Sweden's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Uganda ahead.
Sweden ranks 160th and Uganda ranks 158th of 200 countries.
Uganda has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Sweden | Uganda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | Uganda |
| 2000s | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | Uganda |
| 2010s | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | Uganda |
| 2020s | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | Uganda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher pm exposure 1990 2017, per capita, Sweden or Uganda?
- Uganda, at 0 units per person against 0 units per person in Sweden as of 2023.
- What is the difference in pm exposure 1990 2017, per capita between Sweden and Uganda?
- 0 units per person, with Uganda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sweden and Uganda?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
- How do Sweden and Uganda rank globally for pm exposure 1990 2017, per capita?
- Sweden ranks 160th and Uganda ranks 158th of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Pm exposure 1990 2017, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Pm exposure 1990 2017 divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.