Libya vs Rwanda: Pm exposure 1990 2017, per capita
Libya
0 units per person
in 2023
Rwanda
0 units per person
in 2023
Libya rank
96th
Rwanda rank
99th
Pm exposure 1990 2017, per capita over time
- Libya
- Rwanda
How they compare
Libya currently reports 0 units per person against 0 units per person in Rwanda, a difference of 0 units per person.
That makes Libya's figure about 1.1 times Rwanda's.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Rwanda ahead.
Libya ranks 96th and Rwanda ranks 99th of 200 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Libya averaged higher in 3 and Rwanda in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Libya | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | Rwanda |
| 2000s | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | Libya |
| 2010s | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | Libya |
| 2020s | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | Libya |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher pm exposure 1990 2017, per capita, Libya or Rwanda?
- Libya, at 0 units per person against 0 units per person in Rwanda as of 2023.
- What is the difference in pm exposure 1990 2017, per capita between Libya and Rwanda?
- 0 units per person, with Libya ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Libya and Rwanda?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
- How do Libya and Rwanda rank globally for pm exposure 1990 2017, per capita?
- Libya ranks 96th and Rwanda ranks 99th of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Pm exposure 1990 2017, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Pm exposure 1990 2017 divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.