Jamaica vs Latvia: Pm exposure 1990 2017, per capita
Jamaica
0 units per person
in 2023
Latvia
0 units per person
in 2023
Jamaica rank
63rd
Latvia rank
65th
Pm exposure 1990 2017, per capita over time
- Jamaica
- Latvia
How they compare
Jamaica currently reports 0 units per person against 0 units per person in Latvia, a difference of 0 units per person.
That makes Jamaica's figure about 1.1 times Latvia's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Latvia ahead.
Jamaica ranks 63rd and Latvia ranks 65th of 200 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Jamaica averaged higher in 1 and Latvia in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Jamaica | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | Latvia |
| 2000s | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | Latvia |
| 2010s | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | Latvia |
| 2020s | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | Jamaica |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher pm exposure 1990 2017, per capita, Jamaica or Latvia?
- Jamaica, at 0 units per person against 0 units per person in Latvia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in pm exposure 1990 2017, per capita between Jamaica and Latvia?
- 0 units per person, with Jamaica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Jamaica and Latvia?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
- How do Jamaica and Latvia rank globally for pm exposure 1990 2017, per capita?
- Jamaica ranks 63rd and Latvia ranks 65th of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Pm exposure 1990 2017, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Pm exposure 1990 2017 divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.