Guatemala vs Tunisia: Pm exposure 1990 2017, per capita
Guatemala
0 units per person
in 2023
Tunisia
0 units per person
in 2023
Guatemala rank
115th
Tunisia rank
117th
Pm exposure 1990 2017, per capita over time
- Guatemala
- Tunisia
How they compare
Guatemala currently reports 0 units per person against 0 units per person in Tunisia, a difference of 0 units per person.
That makes Guatemala's figure about 1.1 times Tunisia's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Guatemala ahead.
Guatemala ranks 115th and Tunisia ranks 117th of 200 countries.
Guatemala has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guatemala | Tunisia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | Guatemala |
| 2000s | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | Guatemala |
| 2010s | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | Guatemala |
| 2020s | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | Guatemala |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher pm exposure 1990 2017, per capita, Guatemala or Tunisia?
- Guatemala, at 0 units per person against 0 units per person in Tunisia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in pm exposure 1990 2017, per capita between Guatemala and Tunisia?
- 0 units per person, with Guatemala ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Tunisia?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
- How do Guatemala and Tunisia rank globally for pm exposure 1990 2017, per capita?
- Guatemala ranks 115th and Tunisia ranks 117th of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Pm exposure 1990 2017, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Pm exposure 1990 2017 divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.