Brazil vs Russia: Pm exposure 1990 2017, per capita
Brazil
0 units per person
in 2023
Russia
0 units per person
in 2023
Brazil rank
197th
Russia rank
195th
Pm exposure 1990 2017, per capita over time
- Brazil
- Russia
How they compare
Russia currently reports 0 units per person against 0 units per person in Brazil, a difference of 0 units per person.
That makes Russia's figure about 1.3 times Brazil's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Russia ahead.
Brazil ranks 197th and Russia ranks 195th of 200 countries.
Russia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | Russia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | Russia |
| 2000s | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | Russia |
| 2010s | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | Russia |
| 2020s | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | Russia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher pm exposure 1990 2017, per capita, Brazil or Russia?
- Russia, at 0 units per person against 0 units per person in Brazil as of 2023.
- What is the difference in pm exposure 1990 2017, per capita between Brazil and Russia?
- 0 units per person, with Russia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Russia?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
- How do Brazil and Russia rank globally for pm exposure 1990 2017, per capita?
- Brazil ranks 197th and Russia ranks 195th of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Pm exposure 1990 2017, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Pm exposure 1990 2017 divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.