Bahamas vs Eswatini: Pm exposure 1990 2017, per capita
Bahamas
0 units per person
in 2023
Eswatini
0 units per person
in 2023
Bahamas rank
44th
Eswatini rank
43rd
Pm exposure 1990 2017, per capita over time
- Bahamas
- Eswatini
How they compare
Eswatini currently reports 0 units per person against 0 units per person in Bahamas, a difference of 0 units per person.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Bahamas ahead.
Bahamas ranks 44th and Eswatini ranks 43rd of 200 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Bahamas averaged higher in 2 and Eswatini in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bahamas | Eswatini | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | Bahamas |
| 2000s | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | Bahamas |
| 2010s | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | Eswatini |
| 2020s | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | Eswatini |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher pm exposure 1990 2017, per capita, Bahamas or Eswatini?
- Eswatini, at 0 units per person against 0 units per person in Bahamas as of 2023.
- What is the difference in pm exposure 1990 2017, per capita between Bahamas and Eswatini?
- 0 units per person, with Eswatini ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bahamas and Eswatini?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
- How do Bahamas and Eswatini rank globally for pm exposure 1990 2017, per capita?
- Bahamas ranks 44th and Eswatini ranks 43rd of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Pm exposure 1990 2017, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Pm exposure 1990 2017 divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.