Republic of Korea vs Macao: PISA: Male 15-year-olds by science proficiency level (%). Level 4
PISA: Male 15-year-olds by science proficiency level (%). Level 4 over time
- Republic of Korea
- Macao
How they compare
Macao currently reports 30.0% against 24.5% in Republic of Korea, a difference of 5.5%.
That makes Macao's figure about 1.2 times Republic of Korea's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Republic of Korea ahead.
Republic of Korea ranks 4th and Macao ranks 1st of 52 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Republic of Korea averaged higher in 1 and Macao in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Republic of Korea | Macao | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 27.4% | 23.1% | 4.2% | Republic of Korea |
| 2010s | 25.7% | 27.6% | 1.9% | Macao |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher pisa: male 15-year-olds by science proficiency level (%). level 4, Republic of Korea or Macao?
- Macao, at 30.0% against 24.5% in Republic of Korea as of 2018.
- What is the difference in pisa: male 15-year-olds by science proficiency level (%). level 4 between Republic of Korea and Macao?
- 5.5%, with Macao ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Republic of Korea and Macao?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2018.
- How do Republic of Korea and Macao rank globally for pisa: male 15-year-olds by science proficiency level (%). level 4?
- Republic of Korea ranks 4th and Macao ranks 1st of 52 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- OECD Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA), published as PISA: Male 15-year-olds by science proficiency level (%). Level 4. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of 15-year-old male students scoring higher than 559 but less than or equal to 633 on the PISA science scale. At Level 4, students can use more complex or more abstract content knowledge, which is either provided or recalled, to construct explanations of more complex or less familiar events and processes. They can conduct experiments involving two or more independent variables in a constrained context. They are able to justify an experimental design, drawing on elements of procedural and epistemic knowledge. Level 4 students can interpret data drawn from a moderately complex data set or less familiar context, draw appropriate conclusions that go beyond the data and provide justifications for their choices. Data reflect country performance in the stated year, but may not be comparable across years or countries. Consult the PISA website for more detailed information: http://www.oecd.org/pisa/