Ireland vs Japan: PISA: Male 15-year-olds by reading proficiency level (%). Level 1C
PISA: Male 15-year-olds by reading proficiency level (%). Level 1C over time
- Ireland
- Japan
How they compare
Ireland currently reports 0.0% against 0.0% in Japan, a difference of 0.0%.
Across all 7 years both countries report, Japan has been ahead every year.
Ireland ranks 47th and Japan ranks 47th of 54 countries.
Japan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ireland | Japan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.2% | 0.8% | 0.5% | Japan |
| 2010s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher pisa: male 15-year-olds by reading proficiency level (%). level 1c, Ireland or Japan?
- Ireland, at 0.0% against 0.0% in Japan as of 2018.
- What is the difference in pisa: male 15-year-olds by reading proficiency level (%). level 1c between Ireland and Japan?
- 0.0%, with Ireland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ireland and Japan?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2018.
- How do Ireland and Japan rank globally for pisa: male 15-year-olds by reading proficiency level (%). level 1c?
- Ireland ranks 47th and Japan ranks 47th of 54 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- OECD Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA), published as PISA: Male 15-year-olds by reading proficiency level (%). Level 1C. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of 15-year-old male students scoring higher than 189 but lower than or equal to 262 on the PISA reading scale. Readers at Level 1C can understand and affirm the meaning of short, syntactically simple sentences on a literal level, and read for a clear and simple purpose within a limited amount of time. Tasks at this level involve simple vocabulary and syntactic structures. Use caution in comparing proficiency scores across years. For more information on comparability of results, consult the PISA website: http://www.oecd.org/pisa/