Denmark vs Poland: PISA: Male 15-year-olds by reading proficiency level (%). Level 1C
PISA: Male 15-year-olds by reading proficiency level (%). Level 1C over time
- Denmark
- Poland
How they compare
Denmark currently reports 0.0% against 0.0% in Poland, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 7 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Poland ahead.
Denmark ranks 47th and Poland ranks 47th of 54 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Denmark averaged higher in 1 and Poland in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Denmark | Poland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.8% | 1.0% | 0.2% | Poland |
| 2010s | 0.3% | 0.0% | 0.3% | Denmark |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher pisa: male 15-year-olds by reading proficiency level (%). level 1c, Denmark or Poland?
- Denmark, at 0.0% against 0.0% in Poland as of 2018.
- What is the difference in pisa: male 15-year-olds by reading proficiency level (%). level 1c between Denmark and Poland?
- 0.0%, with Denmark ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Denmark and Poland?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2018.
- How do Denmark and Poland rank globally for pisa: male 15-year-olds by reading proficiency level (%). level 1c?
- Denmark ranks 47th and Poland ranks 47th of 54 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- OECD Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA), published as PISA: Male 15-year-olds by reading proficiency level (%). Level 1C. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of 15-year-old male students scoring higher than 189 but lower than or equal to 262 on the PISA reading scale. Readers at Level 1C can understand and affirm the meaning of short, syntactically simple sentences on a literal level, and read for a clear and simple purpose within a limited amount of time. Tasks at this level involve simple vocabulary and syntactic structures. Use caution in comparing proficiency scores across years. For more information on comparability of results, consult the PISA website: http://www.oecd.org/pisa/