Republic of Korea vs Türkiye: PISA: Male 15-year-olds by mathematics proficiency level (%). Level 3
PISA: Male 15-year-olds by mathematics proficiency level (%). Level 3 over time
- Republic of Korea
- Türkiye
How they compare
Republic of Korea currently reports 22.0% against 20.9% in Türkiye, a difference of 1.1%.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Republic of Korea has been ahead every year.
Republic of Korea ranks 34th and Türkiye ranks 37th of 53 countries.
Republic of Korea has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Republic of Korea | Türkiye | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 22.6% | 15.0% | 7.7% | Republic of Korea |
| 2010s | 21.2% | 17.9% | 3.3% | Republic of Korea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher pisa: male 15-year-olds by mathematics proficiency level (%). level 3, Republic of Korea or Türkiye?
- Republic of Korea, at 22.0% against 20.9% in Türkiye as of 2018.
- What is the difference in pisa: male 15-year-olds by mathematics proficiency level (%). level 3 between Republic of Korea and Türkiye?
- 1.1%, with Republic of Korea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Republic of Korea and Türkiye?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2018.
- How do Republic of Korea and Türkiye rank globally for pisa: male 15-year-olds by mathematics proficiency level (%). level 3?
- Republic of Korea ranks 34th and Türkiye ranks 37th of 53 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- OECD Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA), published as PISA: Male 15-year-olds by mathematics proficiency level (%). Level 3. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of 15-year-old male students scoring higher than 482 but lower than or equal to 545 points on the PISA mathematics scale. At Level 3, students can execute clearly described procedures, including those that require sequential decisions. Their interpretations are sufficiently sound to be a base for building a simple model or for selecting and applying simple problem- solving strategies. Students at this level can interpret and use representations based on different information sources and reason directly from them. They typically show some ability to handle percentages, fractions and decimal numbers, and to work with proportional relationships. Their solutions reflect that they have engaged in basic interpretation and reasoning. Data reflects country performance in the stated year according to PISA reports, but may not be comparable across years or countries. Consult the PISA website for more detailed information: http://www.oecd.org/pisa/