Australia vs Hong Kong, China: PISA: Female 15-year-olds by science proficiency level (%). Level 5
PISA: Female 15-year-olds by science proficiency level (%). Level 5 over time
- Australia
- Hong Kong, China
How they compare
Australia currently reports 7.2% against 7.1% in Hong Kong, China, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Hong Kong, China ahead.
Australia ranks 12th and Hong Kong, China ranks 14th of 52 countries.
Hong Kong, China has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Hong Kong, China | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 10.9% | 13.0% | 2.1% | Hong Kong, China |
| 2010s | 8.4% | 8.7% | 0.3% | Hong Kong, China |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher pisa: female 15-year-olds by science proficiency level (%). level 5, Australia or Hong Kong, China?
- Australia, at 7.2% against 7.1% in Hong Kong, China as of 2018.
- What is the difference in pisa: female 15-year-olds by science proficiency level (%). level 5 between Australia and Hong Kong, China?
- 0.1%, with Australia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Hong Kong, China?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2018.
- How do Australia and Hong Kong, China rank globally for pisa: female 15-year-olds by science proficiency level (%). level 5?
- Australia ranks 12th and Hong Kong, China ranks 14th of 52 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- OECD Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA), published as PISA: Female 15-year-olds by science proficiency level (%). Level 5. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of 15-year-old female students scoring higher than 633 but less than or equal to 708 on the PISA science scale. At Level 5, students can use abstract scientific ideas or concepts to explain unfamiliar and more complex phenomena, events and processes involving multiple causal links. They are able to apply more sophisticated epistemic knowledge to evaluate alternative experimental designs and justify their choices and use theoretical knowledge to interpret information or make predictions. Level 5 students can evaluate ways of exploring a given question scientifically and identify limitations in interpretations of data sets including sources and the effects of uncertainty in scientific data. Data reflect country performance in the stated year, but may not be comparable across years or countries. Consult the PISA website for more detailed information: http://www.oecd.org/pisa/