Latvia vs Poland: PISA: Female 15-year-olds by reading proficiency level (%). Level 1C
PISA: Female 15-year-olds by reading proficiency level (%). Level 1C over time
- Latvia
- Poland
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 0.0% against 0.0% in Poland, a difference of 0.0%.
Across all 7 years both countries report, Poland has been ahead every year.
Latvia ranks 19th and Poland ranks 19th of 54 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Poland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.2% | 0.2% | 0.0% | — |
| 2010s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher pisa: female 15-year-olds by reading proficiency level (%). level 1c, Latvia or Poland?
- Latvia, at 0.0% against 0.0% in Poland as of 2018.
- What is the difference in pisa: female 15-year-olds by reading proficiency level (%). level 1c between Latvia and Poland?
- 0.0%, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Poland?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2018.
- How do Latvia and Poland rank globally for pisa: female 15-year-olds by reading proficiency level (%). level 1c?
- Latvia ranks 19th and Poland ranks 19th of 54 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- OECD Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA), published as PISA: Female 15-year-olds by reading proficiency level (%). Level 1C. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of 15-year-old female students scoring higher than 189 but lower than or equal to 262 on the PISA reading scale. Readers at Level 1C can understand and affirm the meaning of short, syntactically simple sentences on a literal level, and read for a clear and simple purpose within a limited amount of time. Tasks at this level involve simple vocabulary and syntactic structures. Use caution in comparing proficiency scores across years. For more information on comparability of results, consult the PISA website: http://www.oecd.org/pisa/