OECD members vs Tunisia: PISA: Female 15-year-olds by reading proficiency level (%). Level 1B
PISA: Female 15-year-olds by reading proficiency level (%). Level 1B over time
- OECD members
- Tunisia
How they compare
Tunisia currently reports 13.0% against 2.0% in OECD members, a difference of 11.0%.
That makes Tunisia's figure about 6.5 times OECD members's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Tunisia has been ahead every year.
OECD members ranks 1st and Tunisia ranks 1st of 1 groups.
Tunisia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | OECD members | Tunisia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1.7% | 8.3% | 6.7% | Tunisia |
| 2010s | 1.5% | 10.0% | 8.5% | Tunisia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher pisa: female 15-year-olds by reading proficiency level (%). level 1b, OECD members or Tunisia?
- Tunisia, at 13.0% against 2.0% in OECD members as of 2015.
- What is the difference in pisa: female 15-year-olds by reading proficiency level (%). level 1b between OECD members and Tunisia?
- 11.0%, with Tunisia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for OECD members and Tunisia?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2015.
- How do OECD members and Tunisia rank globally for pisa: female 15-year-olds by reading proficiency level (%). level 1b?
- OECD members ranks 1st and Tunisia ranks 1st of 1 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- OECD Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA), published as PISA: Female 15-year-olds by reading proficiency level (%). Level 1B. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of 15-year-old female students scoring higher than 262 but lower than or equal to 335 on the PISA reading scale. Readers at Level 1b can evaluate the literal meaning of simple sentences. They can also interpret the literal meaning of texts by making simple connections between adjacent pieces of information in the question and/or the text. Readers at this level can scan for and locate a single piece of prominently placed, explicitly stated information in a single sentence, a short text or a simple list. They can access a relevant page from a small set based on simple prompts when explicit cues are present. Tasks at Level 1b explicitly direct readers to consider relevant factors in the task and in the text. Texts at this level are short and typically provide support to the reader, such as through repetition of information, pictures or familiar symbols. There is minimal competing information. 2000, 2003, and 2006 PISA assessments used a different reading proficiency scale (Below Level 1 to Level 5) than later assessments. Data for 2000, 2003, and 2006 for Level 1B were not included in PISA reports, but values in this database were calculated based on the current Level 1B score range. Use caution in comparing proficiency scores across years. For more information on comparability of results, consult the PISA website: http://www.oecd.org/pisa/