Lithuania vs Slovenia: PISA: Female 15-year-olds by mathematics proficiency level (%). Level
PISA: Female 15-year-olds by mathematics proficiency level (%). Level over time
- Lithuania
- Slovenia
How they compare
Slovenia currently reports 27.3% against 27.1% in Lithuania, a difference of 0.2%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Slovenia ahead.
Lithuania ranks 13th and Slovenia ranks 11th of 53 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Lithuania averaged higher in 1 and Slovenia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lithuania | Slovenia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 26.0% | 25.7% | 0.3% | Lithuania |
| 2010s | 26.3% | 26.5% | 0.2% | Slovenia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher pisa: female 15-year-olds by mathematics proficiency level (%). level, Lithuania or Slovenia?
- Slovenia, at 27.3% against 27.1% in Lithuania as of 2018.
- What is the difference in pisa: female 15-year-olds by mathematics proficiency level (%). level between Lithuania and Slovenia?
- 0.2%, with Slovenia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Slovenia?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2018.
- How do Lithuania and Slovenia rank globally for pisa: female 15-year-olds by mathematics proficiency level (%). level?
- Lithuania ranks 13th and Slovenia ranks 11th of 53 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- OECD Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA), published as PISA: Female 15-year-olds by mathematics proficiency level (%). Level 3. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of 15-year-old female students scoring higher than 482 but lower than or equal to 545 points on the PISA mathematics scale. At Level 3, students can execute clearly described procedures, including those that require sequential decisions. Their interpretations are sufficiently sound to be a base for building a simple model or for selecting and applying simple problem- solving strategies. Students at this level can interpret and use representations based on different information sources and reason directly from them. They typically show some ability to handle percentages, fractions and decimal numbers, and to work with proportional relationships. Their solutions reflect that they have engaged in basic interpretation and reasoning. Data reflects country performance in the stated year according to PISA reports, but may not be comparable across years or countries. Consult the PISA website for more detailed information: http://www.oecd.org/pisa/