Canada vs South Korea: PISA: 15-year-olds by science proficiency level (%). Level 4
PISA: 15-year-olds by science proficiency level (%). Level 4 over time
- Canada
- South Korea
How they compare
South Korea currently reports 24.5% against 23.5% in Canada, a difference of 1.0%.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Canada ahead.
Canada ranks 7th and South Korea ranks 6th of 52 countries.
South Korea has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Canada | South Korea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 26.9% | 27.9% | 1.0% | South Korea |
| 2010s | 25.0% | 26.2% | 1.2% | South Korea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher pisa: 15-year-olds by science proficiency level (%). level 4, Canada or South Korea?
- South Korea, at 24.5% against 23.5% in Canada as of 2018.
- What is the difference in pisa: 15-year-olds by science proficiency level (%). level 4 between Canada and South Korea?
- 1.0%, with South Korea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Canada and South Korea?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2018.
- How do Canada and South Korea rank globally for pisa: 15-year-olds by science proficiency level (%). level 4?
- Canada ranks 7th and South Korea ranks 6th of 52 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- OECD Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA), published as PISA: 15-year-olds by science proficiency level (%). Level 4. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of 15-year-old students scoring higher than 559 but less than or equal to 633 on the PISA science scale. At Level 4, students can use more complex or more abstract content knowledge, which is either provided or recalled, to construct explanations of more complex or less familiar events and processes. They can conduct experiments involving two or more independent variables in a constrained context. They are able to justify an experimental design, drawing on elements of procedural and epistemic knowledge. Level 4 students can interpret data drawn from a moderately complex data set or less familiar context, draw appropriate conclusions that go beyond the data and provide justifications for their choices. Data reflect country performance in the stated year, but may not be comparable across years or countries. Consult the PISA website for more detailed information: http://www.oecd.org/pisa/