Macao Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China vs Poland, Republic of: PISA: 15-year-olds by reading proficiency level (%). Level 6
PISA: 15-year-olds by reading proficiency level (%). Level 6 over time
- Macao Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China
- Poland, Republic of
How they compare
Macao Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China currently reports 2.0% against 2.0% in Poland, Republic of, a difference of 0.0%.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Poland, Republic of has been ahead every year.
Macao Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China ranks 5th and Poland, Republic of ranks 5th of 55 countries.
Poland, Republic of has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Macao Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China | Poland, Republic of | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.0% | 1.3% | 1.3% | Poland, Republic of |
| 2010s | 1.0% | 1.3% | 0.3% | Poland, Republic of |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher pisa: 15-year-olds by reading proficiency level (%). level 6, Macao Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China or Poland, Republic of?
- Macao Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China, at 2.0% against 2.0% in Poland, Republic of as of 2018.
- What is the difference in pisa: 15-year-olds by reading proficiency level (%). level 6 between Macao Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China and Poland, Republic of?
- 0.0%, with Macao Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Macao Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China and Poland, Republic of?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2018.
- How do Macao Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China and Poland, Republic of rank globally for pisa: 15-year-olds by reading proficiency level (%). level 6?
- Macao Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China ranks 5th and Poland, Republic of ranks 5th of 55 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- OECD Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA), published as PISA: 15-year-olds by reading proficiency level (%). Level 6. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of 15-year-old students scoring higher than 698 on the PISA reading scale. Readers at Level 6 can comprehend lengthy and abstract texts in which the information of interest is deeply embedded and only indirectly related to the task. They can compare, contrast and integrate information representing multiple and potentially conflicting perspectives, using multiple criteria and generating inferences across distant pieces of information to determine how the information may be used. Readers at Level 6 can reflect deeply on the text’s source in relation to its content, using criteria external to the text. They can compare and contrast information across texts, identifying and resolving inter-textual discrepancies and conflicts through inferences about the sources of information, their explicit or vested interests, and other cues as to the validity of the information. Tasks at Level 6 typically require the reader to set up elaborate plans, combining multiple criteria and generating inferences to relate the task and the text(s). Materials at this level include one or several complex and abstract text(s), involving multiple and possibly discrepant perspectives. Target information may take the form of details that are deeply embedded within or across texts and potentially obscured by competing information. 2000, 2003, and 2006 PISA assessments used a different reading proficiency scale (Levels 1 to 5) than later assessments. Level 6 data were not available in the 2000/2003/2006 PISA Reports, so these figures were calculated based on the current PISA Reading Proficiency Level 6 (698+). Use caution in comparing proficiency scores across years. For more information on comparability of results, consult the PISA website: http://www.oecd.org/pisa/