LTU vs POL: PISA: 15-year-olds by reading proficiency level (%). Level 1C

LTU
1.0%
in 2018
POL
1.0%
in 2018
LTU rank
24th
POL rank
24th

PISA: 15-year-olds by reading proficiency level (%). Level 1C over time

  • LTU
  • POL
00.511.52200020092018

How they compare

LTU currently reports 1.0% against 1.0% in POL, a difference of 0.0%.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2006 it was POL ahead.

LTU ranks 24th and POL ranks 24th of 54 countries.

LTU has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade LTU POL Difference Ahead
2000s 1.0% 1.0% 0.0%
2010s 1.0% 0.3% 0.7% LTU

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher pisa: 15-year-olds by reading proficiency level (%). level 1c, LTU or POL?
LTU, at 1.0% against 1.0% in POL as of 2018.
What is the difference in pisa: 15-year-olds by reading proficiency level (%). level 1c between LTU and POL?
0.0%, with LTU ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for LTU and POL?
5 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2018.
How do LTU and POL rank globally for pisa: 15-year-olds by reading proficiency level (%). level 1c?
LTU ranks 24th and POL ranks 24th of 54 countries.
Where does this data come from?
OECD Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA), published as PISA: 15-year-olds by reading proficiency level (%). Level 1C. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
PISA: 15-year-olds by reading proficiency level (%). Level 1C
Source
OECD Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
54 places, 344 data points, 2000–2018
Last refreshed

Percentage of 15-year-old students scoring higher than 189 but lower than or equal to 262 on the PISA reading scale. Readers at Level 1C can understand and affirm the meaning of short, syntactically simple sentences on a literal level, and read for a clear and simple purpose within a limited amount of time. Tasks at this level involve simple vocabulary and syntactic structures. Use caution in comparing proficiency scores across years. For more information on comparability of results, consult the PISA website: http://www.oecd.org/pisa/