Latvia vs Sweden: PISA: 15-year-olds by reading proficiency level (%). Level 1C
PISA: 15-year-olds by reading proficiency level (%). Level 1C over time
- Latvia
- Sweden
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 1.0% against 1.0% in Sweden, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 7 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Latvia ahead.
Latvia ranks 24th and Sweden ranks 24th of 54 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Latvia averaged higher in 1 and Sweden in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Sweden | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1.2% | 0.8% | 0.5% | Latvia |
| 2010s | 0.7% | 1.3% | 0.7% | Sweden |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher pisa: 15-year-olds by reading proficiency level (%). level 1c, Latvia or Sweden?
- Latvia, at 1.0% against 1.0% in Sweden as of 2018.
- What is the difference in pisa: 15-year-olds by reading proficiency level (%). level 1c between Latvia and Sweden?
- 0.0%, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Sweden?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2018.
- How do Latvia and Sweden rank globally for pisa: 15-year-olds by reading proficiency level (%). level 1c?
- Latvia ranks 24th and Sweden ranks 24th of 54 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- OECD Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA), published as PISA: 15-year-olds by reading proficiency level (%). Level 1C. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of 15-year-old students scoring higher than 189 but lower than or equal to 262 on the PISA reading scale. Readers at Level 1C can understand and affirm the meaning of short, syntactically simple sentences on a literal level, and read for a clear and simple purpose within a limited amount of time. Tasks at this level involve simple vocabulary and syntactic structures. Use caution in comparing proficiency scores across years. For more information on comparability of results, consult the PISA website: http://www.oecd.org/pisa/