South Korea vs Sweden: PISA: 15-year-olds by reading proficiency level (%). Level 1C
PISA: 15-year-olds by reading proficiency level (%). Level 1C over time
- South Korea
- Sweden
How they compare
South Korea currently reports 1.0% against 1.0% in Sweden, a difference of 0.0%.
Across all 7 years both countries report, Sweden has been ahead every year.
South Korea ranks 24th and Sweden ranks 24th of 54 countries.
Sweden has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | South Korea | Sweden | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.0% | 0.8% | 0.8% | Sweden |
| 2010s | 0.7% | 1.3% | 0.7% | Sweden |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher pisa: 15-year-olds by reading proficiency level (%). level 1c, South Korea or Sweden?
- South Korea, at 1.0% against 1.0% in Sweden as of 2018.
- What is the difference in pisa: 15-year-olds by reading proficiency level (%). level 1c between South Korea and Sweden?
- 0.0%, with South Korea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for South Korea and Sweden?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2018.
- How do South Korea and Sweden rank globally for pisa: 15-year-olds by reading proficiency level (%). level 1c?
- South Korea ranks 24th and Sweden ranks 24th of 54 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- OECD Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA), published as PISA: 15-year-olds by reading proficiency level (%). Level 1C. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of 15-year-old students scoring higher than 189 but lower than or equal to 262 on the PISA reading scale. Readers at Level 1C can understand and affirm the meaning of short, syntactically simple sentences on a literal level, and read for a clear and simple purpose within a limited amount of time. Tasks at this level involve simple vocabulary and syntactic structures. Use caution in comparing proficiency scores across years. For more information on comparability of results, consult the PISA website: http://www.oecd.org/pisa/