Austria vs Lithuania: PISA: 15-year-olds by reading proficiency level (%). Level 1C
PISA: 15-year-olds by reading proficiency level (%). Level 1C over time
- Austria
- Lithuania
How they compare
Austria currently reports 1.0% against 1.0% in Lithuania, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Austria ahead.
Austria ranks 24th and Lithuania ranks 24th of 54 countries.
Austria has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Austria | Lithuania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2.0% | 1.0% | 1.0% | Austria |
| 2010s | 1.3% | 1.0% | 0.3% | Austria |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher pisa: 15-year-olds by reading proficiency level (%). level 1c, Austria or Lithuania?
- Austria, at 1.0% against 1.0% in Lithuania as of 2018.
- What is the difference in pisa: 15-year-olds by reading proficiency level (%). level 1c between Austria and Lithuania?
- 0.0%, with Austria ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and Lithuania?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2018.
- How do Austria and Lithuania rank globally for pisa: 15-year-olds by reading proficiency level (%). level 1c?
- Austria ranks 24th and Lithuania ranks 24th of 54 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- OECD Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA), published as PISA: 15-year-olds by reading proficiency level (%). Level 1C. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of 15-year-old students scoring higher than 189 but lower than or equal to 262 on the PISA reading scale. Readers at Level 1C can understand and affirm the meaning of short, syntactically simple sentences on a literal level, and read for a clear and simple purpose within a limited amount of time. Tasks at this level involve simple vocabulary and syntactic structures. Use caution in comparing proficiency scores across years. For more information on comparability of results, consult the PISA website: http://www.oecd.org/pisa/