Japan vs Lithuania: PISA: 15-year-olds by reading proficiency level (%). Below Level 1C

Japan
0.0%
in 2018
Lithuania
0.0%
in 2018
Japan rank
7th
Lithuania rank
7th

PISA: 15-year-olds by reading proficiency level (%). Below Level 1C over time

  • Japan
  • Lithuania
00.20.40.60.81200020092018

How they compare

Japan currently reports 0.0% against 0.0% in Lithuania, a difference of 0.0%.

Across all 5 years both countries report, Lithuania has been ahead every year.

Japan ranks 7th and Lithuania ranks 7th of 54 countries.

Head to head by decade

Decade Japan Lithuania Difference Ahead
2000s 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
2010s 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher pisa: 15-year-olds by reading proficiency level (%). below level 1c, Japan or Lithuania?
Japan, at 0.0% against 0.0% in Lithuania as of 2018.
What is the difference in pisa: 15-year-olds by reading proficiency level (%). below level 1c between Japan and Lithuania?
0.0%, with Japan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Japan and Lithuania?
5 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2018.
How do Japan and Lithuania rank globally for pisa: 15-year-olds by reading proficiency level (%). below level 1c?
Japan ranks 7th and Lithuania ranks 7th of 54 countries.
Where does this data come from?
OECD Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA), published as PISA: 15-year-olds by reading proficiency level (%). Below Level 1C. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
PISA: 15-year-olds by reading proficiency level (%). Below Level 1C
Source
OECD Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
54 places, 344 data points, 2000–2018
Last refreshed

Percentage of 15-year-old students scoring students below the lowest proficiency level (1C) on the PISA reading scale. Students with scores below Level 1C (less or equal to 189 points) usually do not succeed at the most basic reading tasks that PISA measures. Use caution in comparing proficiency scores across years. For more information on comparability of results, consult the PISA website: http://www.oecd.org/pisa/