Denmark vs Japan: PISA: 15-year-olds by mathematics proficiency level (%). Below Level 1
PISA: 15-year-olds by mathematics proficiency level (%). Below Level 1 over time
- Denmark
- Japan
How they compare
Denmark currently reports 3.7% against 2.9% in Japan, a difference of 0.8%.
That makes Denmark's figure about 1.3 times Japan's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Japan ahead.
Denmark ranks 49th and Japan ranks 50th of 53 countries.
Denmark has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Denmark | Japan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 4.4% | 4.2% | 0.2% | Denmark |
| 2010s | 3.7% | 3.0% | 0.7% | Denmark |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher pisa: 15-year-olds by mathematics proficiency level (%). below level 1, Denmark or Japan?
- Denmark, at 3.7% against 2.9% in Japan as of 2018.
- What is the difference in pisa: 15-year-olds by mathematics proficiency level (%). below level 1 between Denmark and Japan?
- 0.8%, with Denmark ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Denmark and Japan?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2018.
- How do Denmark and Japan rank globally for pisa: 15-year-olds by mathematics proficiency level (%). below level 1?
- Denmark ranks 49th and Japan ranks 50th of 53 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- OECD Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA), published as PISA: 15-year-olds by mathematics proficiency level (%). Below Level 1. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of 15-year-old students below the lowest proficiency level (scoring 358 or below) on the PISA mathematics scale. Students below Level 1 may be able to perform very direct and straightforward mathematical tasks, such as reading a single value from a well-labeled chart or table where the labels on the chart match the words in the stimulus and question, so that the selection criteria are clear and the relationship between the chart and the aspects of the context depicted are evident, and performing arithmetic calculations with whole numbers by following clear and well-defined instructions. Data reflects country performance in the stated year according to PISA reports, but may not be comparable across years or countries. Consult the PISA website for more detailed information: http://www.oecd.org/pisa/