Lithuania vs Sao Tome and Principe: Personal remittances and foreign aid received, per square kilometre

Lithuania
12,427 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Sao Tome and Principe
11,033 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Lithuania rank
103rd
Sao Tome and Principe rank
106th

Personal remittances and foreign aid received, per square kilometre over time

  • Lithuania
  • Sao Tome and Principe
010.0k20.0k30.0k197819992021

How they compare

Lithuania currently reports 12,427 current US$ per square kilometre against 11,033 current US$ per square kilometre in Sao Tome and Principe, a difference of 1,394 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Lithuania's figure about 1.1 times Sao Tome and Principe's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 25 shared years of data; in 1997 it was Sao Tome and Principe ahead.

Lithuania ranks 103rd and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 106th of 193 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Lithuania averaged higher in 3 and Sao Tome and Principe in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Lithuania Sao Tome and Principe Difference Ahead
1990s 49.71 current US$ per square kilometre 645.83 current US$ per square kilometre 596.12 current US$ per square kilometre Sao Tome and Principe
2000s 11,022 current US$ per square kilometre 1,545 current US$ per square kilometre 9,477 current US$ per square kilometre Lithuania
2010s 25,465 current US$ per square kilometre 16,469 current US$ per square kilometre 8,996 current US$ per square kilometre Lithuania
2020s 12,526 current US$ per square kilometre 10,006 current US$ per square kilometre 2,520 current US$ per square kilometre Lithuania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher personal remittances and foreign aid received, per square kilometre, Lithuania or Sao Tome and Principe?
Lithuania, at 12,427 current US$ per square kilometre against 11,033 current US$ per square kilometre in Sao Tome and Principe as of 2021.
What is the difference in personal remittances and foreign aid received, per square kilometre between Lithuania and Sao Tome and Principe?
1,394 current US$ per square kilometre, with Lithuania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Sao Tome and Principe?
25 years are reported by both, from 1997 to 2021.
How do Lithuania and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for personal remittances and foreign aid received, per square kilometre?
Lithuania ranks 103rd and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 106th of 193 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Personal remittances and foreign aid received, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Lithuania vs Sao Tome and Principe: Personal remittances and foreign aid received, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/personal-remittances-and-foreign-aid-received-per-square-kilometre/lithuania/sao-tome-and-principe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/personal-remittances-and-foreign-aid-received-per-square-kilometre/lithuania/sao-tome-and-principe/">Lithuania vs Sao Tome and Principe: Personal remittances and foreign aid received, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Personal remittances and foreign aid received, per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
193 places, 6,437 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Personal remittances and foreign aid received divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.