Central African Republic vs Papua New Guinea: Personal remittances and foreign aid received, per square kilometre

Central African Republic
0.2551 current US$ per square kilometre
in 1993
Papua New Guinea
6.85 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Central African Republic rank
193rd
Papua New Guinea rank
190th

Personal remittances and foreign aid received, per square kilometre over time

  • Central African Republic
  • Papua New Guinea
0204060197619982021

How they compare

Papua New Guinea currently reports 6.85 current US$ per square kilometre against 0.2551 current US$ per square kilometre in Central African Republic, a difference of 6.59 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Papua New Guinea's figure about 26.9 times Central African Republic's.

Across all 16 years both countries report, Papua New Guinea has been ahead every year.

Central African Republic ranks 193rd and Papua New Guinea ranks 190th of 193 countries.

Papua New Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Central African Republic Papua New Guinea Difference Ahead
1970s 2.37 current US$ per square kilometre 19.74 current US$ per square kilometre 17.36 current US$ per square kilometre Papua New Guinea
1980s 0.0378 current US$ per square kilometre 15.29 current US$ per square kilometre 15.25 current US$ per square kilometre Papua New Guinea
1990s 0.2134 current US$ per square kilometre 37.34 current US$ per square kilometre 37.12 current US$ per square kilometre Papua New Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher personal remittances and foreign aid received, per square kilometre, Central African Republic or Papua New Guinea?
Papua New Guinea, at 6.85 current US$ per square kilometre against 0.2551 current US$ per square kilometre in Central African Republic as of 2021.
What is the difference in personal remittances and foreign aid received, per square kilometre between Central African Republic and Papua New Guinea?
6.59 current US$ per square kilometre, with Papua New Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Papua New Guinea?
16 years are reported by both, from 1977 to 1993.
How do Central African Republic and Papua New Guinea rank globally for personal remittances and foreign aid received, per square kilometre?
Central African Republic ranks 193rd and Papua New Guinea ranks 190th of 193 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Personal remittances and foreign aid received, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Central African Republic vs Papua New Guinea: Personal remittances and foreign aid received, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/personal-remittances-and-foreign-aid-received-per-square-kilometre/central-african-republic/papua-new-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/personal-remittances-and-foreign-aid-received-per-square-kilometre/central-african-republic/papua-new-guinea/">Central African Republic vs Papua New Guinea: Personal remittances and foreign aid received, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Personal remittances and foreign aid received, per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
193 places, 6,437 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Personal remittances and foreign aid received divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.