China vs Upper middle income: Percentage of qualified teachers in upper secondary education

China
1.0%
in 2019
Upper middle income
1.0%
in 2019
China rank
7th
Upper middle income rank
6th

Percentage of qualified teachers in upper secondary education over time

  • China
  • Upper middle income
00.250.50.751201420162019

How they compare

Upper middle income currently reports 1.0% against 1.0% in China, a difference of 0.0%.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Upper middle income ahead.

China ranks 7th and Upper middle income ranks 6th of 22 countries.

Upper middle income has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher percentage of qualified teachers in upper secondary education, China or Upper middle income?
Upper middle income, at 1.0% against 1.0% in China as of 2019.
What is the difference in percentage of qualified teachers in upper secondary education between China and Upper middle income?
0.0%, with Upper middle income ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China and Upper middle income?
5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
How do China and Upper middle income rank globally for percentage of qualified teachers in upper secondary education?
China ranks 7th and Upper middle income ranks 6th of 22 countries.
Where does this data come from?
UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Percentage of qualified teachers in upper secondary education, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China vs Upper middle income: Percentage of qualified teachers in upper secondary education. Statizoid, drawing on UNESCO Institute for Statistics. Retrieved 04 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/percentage-of-qualified-teachers-in-upper-secondary-education-adjusted-gender-parity/china/upper-middle-income/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/percentage-of-qualified-teachers-in-upper-secondary-education-adjusted-gender-parity/china/upper-middle-income/">China vs Upper middle income: Percentage of qualified teachers in upper secondary education</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Percentage of qualified teachers in upper secondary education, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)
Unit
GPIA
Source
UNESCO Institute for Statistics
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
39 places, 232 data points, 2009–2019
Last refreshed

The Adjusted Gender Parity Index (GPIA) is calculated by dividing the female value for the indicator by the male value for the indicator. If the resulting value exceeds 1, the ratio is inverted and subtracted from 2. The adjusted gender parity index is symmetrical around 1 and lies in the range 0-2. An adjusted GPI equal to 1 indicates parity between females and males. In general, a value less than 1 indicates disparity in favor of males and a value greater than 1 indicates disparity in favor of females. For more information, consult the UNESCO Institute for Statistics: http://uis.unesco.org/