China vs IBRD only: Percentage of qualified teachers in upper secondary education
Percentage of qualified teachers in upper secondary education over time
- China
- IBRD only
How they compare
IBRD only currently reports 1.0% against 1.0% in China, a difference of 0.0%.
Across all 5 years both countries report, IBRD only has been ahead every year.
China ranks 7th and IBRD only ranks 7th of 22 countries.
IBRD only has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher percentage of qualified teachers in upper secondary education, China or IBRD only?
- IBRD only, at 1.0% against 1.0% in China as of 2019.
- What is the difference in percentage of qualified teachers in upper secondary education between China and IBRD only?
- 0.0%, with IBRD only ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China and IBRD only?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do China and IBRD only rank globally for percentage of qualified teachers in upper secondary education?
- China ranks 7th and IBRD only ranks 7th of 22 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Percentage of qualified teachers in upper secondary education, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Adjusted Gender Parity Index (GPIA) is calculated by dividing the female value for the indicator by the male value for the indicator. If the resulting value exceeds 1, the ratio is inverted and subtracted from 2. The adjusted gender parity index is symmetrical around 1 and lies in the range 0-2. An adjusted GPI equal to 1 indicates parity between females and males. In general, a value less than 1 indicates disparity in favor of males and a value greater than 1 indicates disparity in favor of females. For more information, consult the UNESCO Institute for Statistics: http://uis.unesco.org/