Hong Kong vs Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD): Percentage of qualified teachers in secondary education, adjusted
Percentage of qualified teachers in secondary education, adjusted over time
- Hong Kong
- Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD)
How they compare
Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD) currently reports 1.0% against 1.0% in Hong Kong, a difference of 0.0%.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD) has been ahead every year.
Hong Kong ranks 18th and Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD) ranks 20th of 34 countries.
Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD) has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher percentage of qualified teachers in secondary education, adjusted, Hong Kong or Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD)?
- Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD), at 1.0% against 1.0% in Hong Kong as of 2019.
- What is the difference in percentage of qualified teachers in secondary education, adjusted between Hong Kong and Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD)?
- 0.0%, with Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD) ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong and Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD)?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Hong Kong and Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD) rank globally for percentage of qualified teachers in secondary education, adjusted?
- Hong Kong ranks 18th and Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD) ranks 20th of 34 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Percentage of qualified teachers in secondary education, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Adjusted Gender Parity Index (GPIA) is calculated by dividing the female value for the indicator by the male value for the indicator. If the resulting value exceeds 1, the ratio is inverted and subtracted from 2. The adjusted gender parity index is symmetrical around 1 and lies in the range 0-2. An adjusted GPI equal to 1 indicates parity between females and males. In general, a value less than 1 indicates disparity in favor of males and a value greater than 1 indicates disparity in favor of females. For more information, consult the UNESCO Institute for Statistics: http://uis.unesco.org/