Equatorial Guinea vs Least developed countries: Percentage of pupils enrolled in primary education who are at least 2

Equatorial Guinea
38.7%
in 2015
Least developed countries
24.2%
in 2019
Equatorial Guinea rank
6th
Least developed countries rank
3rd

Percentage of pupils enrolled in primary education who are at least 2 over time

  • Equatorial Guinea
  • Least developed countries
0204060199920092019

How they compare

Equatorial Guinea currently reports 38.7% against 24.2% in Least developed countries, a difference of 14.5%.

That makes Equatorial Guinea's figure about 1.6 times Least developed countries's.

Across all 8 years both countries report, Equatorial Guinea has been ahead every year.

Equatorial Guinea ranks 6th and Least developed countries ranks 3rd of 155 countries.

Equatorial Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Equatorial Guinea Least developed countries Difference Ahead
2000s 55.7% 31.0% 24.7% Equatorial Guinea
2010s 46.7% 26.8% 19.9% Equatorial Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher percentage of pupils enrolled in primary education who are at least 2, Equatorial Guinea or Least developed countries?
Equatorial Guinea, at 38.7% against 24.2% in Least developed countries as of 2015.
What is the difference in percentage of pupils enrolled in primary education who are at least 2 between Equatorial Guinea and Least developed countries?
14.5%, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Least developed countries?
8 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2015.
How do Equatorial Guinea and Least developed countries rank globally for percentage of pupils enrolled in primary education who are at least 2?
Equatorial Guinea ranks 6th and Least developed countries ranks 3rd of 155 countries.
Where does this data come from?
UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Percentage of pupils enrolled in primary education who are at least 2 years over-age for their current grade, both sexes (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Equatorial Guinea vs Least developed countries: Percentage of pupils enrolled in primary education who are at least 2. Statizoid, drawing on UNESCO Institute for Statistics. Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/percentage-of-pupils-enrolled-in-primary-education-who-are-at-least-2-years-over-age-for/equatorial-guinea/least-developed-countries-un-classification/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/percentage-of-pupils-enrolled-in-primary-education-who-are-at-least-2-years-over-age-for/equatorial-guinea/least-developed-countries-un-classification/">Equatorial Guinea vs Least developed countries: Percentage of pupils enrolled in primary education who are at least 2</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Percentage of pupils enrolled in primary education who are at least 2 years over-age for their current grade, both sexes (%)
Unit
%
Source
UNESCO Institute for Statistics
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
195 places, 2,392 data points, 1997–2020
Last refreshed

Percentage of pupils in primary education who are at least 2 years above the intended age for their grade. The intended age for a given grade is the age at which pupils would enter the grade if they had started school at the official primary entrance age, had studied full-time and had progressed without repeating or skipping a grade. A low value of this indicator will show that the majority of students start school on time and progress with minimum levels of grade repetition. Late school entry and significant grade repetition exacerbate over-age progression and should be discouraged as both are associated with lower levels of student learning achievement. For more information, consult the UNESCO Institute of Statistics website: http://www.uis.unesco.org/Education/