Belgium vs Latvia: Percentage of pupils enrolled in primary education who are at least 2
Percentage of pupils enrolled in primary education who are at least 2 over time
- Belgium
- Latvia
How they compare
Belgium currently reports 1.1% against 1.0% in Latvia, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2013 it was Latvia ahead.
Belgium ranks 106th and Latvia ranks 108th of 155 countries.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher percentage of pupils enrolled in primary education who are at least 2, Belgium or Latvia?
- Belgium, at 1.1% against 1.0% in Latvia as of 2018.
- What is the difference in percentage of pupils enrolled in primary education who are at least 2 between Belgium and Latvia?
- 0.1%, with Belgium ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Latvia?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2013 to 2018.
- How do Belgium and Latvia rank globally for percentage of pupils enrolled in primary education who are at least 2?
- Belgium ranks 106th and Latvia ranks 108th of 155 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Percentage of pupils enrolled in primary education who are at least 2 years over-age for their current grade, both sexes (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of pupils in primary education who are at least 2 years above the intended age for their grade. The intended age for a given grade is the age at which pupils would enter the grade if they had started school at the official primary entrance age, had studied full-time and had progressed without repeating or skipping a grade. A low value of this indicator will show that the majority of students start school on time and progress with minimum levels of grade repetition. Late school entry and significant grade repetition exacerbate over-age progression and should be discouraged as both are associated with lower levels of student learning achievement. For more information, consult the UNESCO Institute of Statistics website: http://www.uis.unesco.org/Education/