Serbia vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Percentage of pupils enrolled in primary education who are at least 2
Percentage of pupils enrolled in primary education who are at least 2 over time
- Serbia
- Saint Kitts and Nevis
How they compare
Saint Kitts and Nevis currently reports 0.7% against 0.6% in Serbia, a difference of 0.1%.
That makes Saint Kitts and Nevis's figure about 1.1 times Serbia's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.
Serbia ranks 120th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 119th of 154 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Serbia averaged higher in 1 and Saint Kitts and Nevis in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Serbia | Saint Kitts and Nevis | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.5% | 0.5% | 0.0% | Serbia |
| 2010s | 0.6% | 0.8% | 0.2% | Saint Kitts and Nevis |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher percentage of pupils enrolled in primary education who are at least 2, Serbia or Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- Saint Kitts and Nevis, at 0.7% against 0.6% in Serbia as of 2016.
- What is the difference in percentage of pupils enrolled in primary education who are at least 2 between Serbia and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- 0.1%, with Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Serbia and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2016.
- How do Serbia and Saint Kitts and Nevis rank globally for percentage of pupils enrolled in primary education who are at least 2?
- Serbia ranks 120th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 119th of 154 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Percentage of pupils enrolled in primary education who are at least 2 years over-age for their current grade, male (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of pupils in primary education who are at least 2 years above the intended age for their grade. The intended age for a given grade is the age at which pupils would enter the grade if they had started school at the official primary entrance age, had studied full-time and had progressed without repeating or skipping a grade. A low value of this indicator will show that the majority of students start school on time and progress with minimum levels of grade repetition. Late school entry and significant grade repetition exacerbate over-age progression and should be discouraged as both are associated with lower levels of student learning achievement. For more information, consult the UNESCO Institute of Statistics website: http://www.uis.unesco.org/Education/