Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) vs Lesotho: Percentage of pupils enrolled in primary education who are at least 2

Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)
28.1%
in 2018
Lesotho
36.8%
in 2017
Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) rank
8th
Lesotho rank
10th

Percentage of pupils enrolled in primary education who are at least 2 over time

  • Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)
  • Lesotho
20406080199820082018

How they compare

Lesotho currently reports 36.8% against 28.1% in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC), a difference of 8.7%.

That makes Lesotho's figure about 1.3 times Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)'s.

Across all 19 years both countries report, Lesotho has been ahead every year.

Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) ranks 8th and Lesotho ranks 10th of 39 groups.

Lesotho has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) Lesotho Difference Ahead
1990s 44.1% 79.8% 35.7% Lesotho
2000s 37.5% 62.8% 25.3% Lesotho
2010s 29.9% 45.5% 15.6% Lesotho

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher percentage of pupils enrolled in primary education who are at least 2, Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) or Lesotho?
Lesotho, at 36.8% against 28.1% in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) as of 2017.
What is the difference in percentage of pupils enrolled in primary education who are at least 2 between Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) and Lesotho?
8.7%, with Lesotho ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) and Lesotho?
19 years are reported by both, from 1999 to 2017.
How do Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) and Lesotho rank globally for percentage of pupils enrolled in primary education who are at least 2?
Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) ranks 8th and Lesotho ranks 10th of 39 groups.
Where does this data come from?
UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Percentage of pupils enrolled in primary education who are at least 2 years over-age for their current grade, male (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) vs Lesotho: Percentage of pupils enrolled in primary education who are at least 2. Statizoid, drawing on UNESCO Institute for Statistics. Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/percentage-of-pupils-enrolled-in-primary-education-who-are-at-least-2-years-over-age-for-4/heavily-indebted-poor-countries-hipc/lesotho/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/percentage-of-pupils-enrolled-in-primary-education-who-are-at-least-2-years-over-age-for-4/heavily-indebted-poor-countries-hipc/lesotho/">Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) vs Lesotho: Percentage of pupils enrolled in primary education who are at least 2</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Percentage of pupils enrolled in primary education who are at least 2 years over-age for their current grade, male (%)
Unit
%
Source
UNESCO Institute for Statistics
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
193 places, 2,314 data points, 1997–2020
Last refreshed

Percentage of pupils in primary education who are at least 2 years above the intended age for their grade. The intended age for a given grade is the age at which pupils would enter the grade if they had started school at the official primary entrance age, had studied full-time and had progressed without repeating or skipping a grade. A low value of this indicator will show that the majority of students start school on time and progress with minimum levels of grade repetition. Late school entry and significant grade repetition exacerbate over-age progression and should be discouraged as both are associated with lower levels of student learning achievement. For more information, consult the UNESCO Institute of Statistics website: http://www.uis.unesco.org/Education/