Armenia vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Percentage of pupils enrolled in primary education who are at least 2
Percentage of pupils enrolled in primary education who are at least 2 over time
- Armenia
- Saint Kitts and Nevis
How they compare
Armenia currently reports 0.7% against 0.7% in Saint Kitts and Nevis, a difference of 0.0%.
That makes Armenia's figure about 1.1 times Saint Kitts and Nevis's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.
Armenia ranks 118th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 119th of 154 countries.
Saint Kitts and Nevis has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Armenia | Saint Kitts and Nevis | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.0% | 0.5% | 0.5% | Saint Kitts and Nevis |
| 2010s | 0.3% | 0.8% | 0.5% | Saint Kitts and Nevis |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher percentage of pupils enrolled in primary education who are at least 2, Armenia or Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- Armenia, at 0.7% against 0.7% in Saint Kitts and Nevis as of 2019.
- What is the difference in percentage of pupils enrolled in primary education who are at least 2 between Armenia and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- 0.0%, with Armenia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2016.
- How do Armenia and Saint Kitts and Nevis rank globally for percentage of pupils enrolled in primary education who are at least 2?
- Armenia ranks 118th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 119th of 154 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Percentage of pupils enrolled in primary education who are at least 2 years over-age for their current grade, male (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of pupils in primary education who are at least 2 years above the intended age for their grade. The intended age for a given grade is the age at which pupils would enter the grade if they had started school at the official primary entrance age, had studied full-time and had progressed without repeating or skipping a grade. A low value of this indicator will show that the majority of students start school on time and progress with minimum levels of grade repetition. Late school entry and significant grade repetition exacerbate over-age progression and should be discouraged as both are associated with lower levels of student learning achievement. For more information, consult the UNESCO Institute of Statistics website: http://www.uis.unesco.org/Education/