Lesotho vs Low income: Percentage of pupils enrolled in lower secondary general education
Percentage of pupils enrolled in lower secondary general education over time
- Lesotho
- Low income
How they compare
Lesotho currently reports 50.1% against 27.1% in Low income, a difference of 23.0%.
That makes Lesotho's figure about 1.8 times Low income's.
Across all 18 years both countries report, Lesotho has been ahead every year.
Lesotho ranks 7th and Low income ranks 8th of 154 countries.
Lesotho has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lesotho | Low income | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 62.6% | 30.3% | 32.3% | Lesotho |
| 2010s | 55.9% | 29.6% | 26.3% | Lesotho |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher percentage of pupils enrolled in lower secondary general education, Lesotho or Low income?
- Lesotho, at 50.1% against 27.1% in Low income as of 2017.
- What is the difference in percentage of pupils enrolled in lower secondary general education between Lesotho and Low income?
- 23.0%, with Lesotho ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lesotho and Low income?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2017.
- How do Lesotho and Low income rank globally for percentage of pupils enrolled in lower secondary general education?
- Lesotho ranks 7th and Low income ranks 8th of 154 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Percentage of pupils enrolled in lower secondary general education who are at least 2 years over-age for their current grade, both sexes (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of pupils in each level of education (primary and lower secondary general education) who are at least 2 years above the intended age for their grade. The intended age for a given grade is the age at which pupils would enter the grade if they had started school at the official primary entrance age, had studied full-time and had progressed without repeating or skipping a grade. The value is calculated as the sum of enrolments across all grades in the given level of education which are 2 or more years older than the intended age for the given grade is expressed as a percentage of the total enrolment in the given level of education. A low value of this indicator will show that the majority of students start school on time and progress with minimum levels of grade repetition. Late school entry and significant grade repetition exacerbate over-age progression and should be discouraged as both are associated with lower levels of student learning achievement. For more information, consult the UNESCO Institute of Statistics website: http://www.uis.unesco.org/Education/