Romania vs Sri Lanka: Per capita sources of protein
Romania
49.37
in 2023
Sri Lanka
49.6
in 2023
Romania rank
57th
Sri Lanka rank
56th
Per capita sources of protein over time
- Romania
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Sri Lanka currently reports 49.6 against 49.37 in Romania, a difference of 0.23.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Romania ahead.
Romania ranks 57th and Sri Lanka ranks 56th of 192 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Romania averaged higher in 6 and Sri Lanka in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Romania | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 63.98 | 37.68 | 26.31 | Romania |
| 1970s | 56.48 | 37.47 | 19.01 | Romania |
| 1980s | 50.98 | 38.44 | 12.54 | Romania |
| 1990s | 51.27 | 39.36 | 11.91 | Romania |
| 2000s | 57.21 | 39.87 | 17.34 | Romania |
| 2010s | 51.71 | 50.48 | 1.23 | Romania |
| 2020s | 49.65 | 52.7 | 3.05 | Sri Lanka |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher per capita sources of protein, Romania or Sri Lanka?
- Sri Lanka, at 49.6 against 49.37 in Romania as of 2023.
- What is the difference in per capita sources of protein between Romania and Sri Lanka?
- 0.23, with Sri Lanka ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Romania and Sri Lanka?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Romania and Sri Lanka rank globally for per capita sources of protein?
- Romania ranks 57th and Sri Lanka ranks 56th of 192 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Per capita sources of protein. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.